On 2/21/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/21/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's a bug: > > % diff url.scm~ url.scm > 222c222 > < (list userinfo host (or (string->number port) port)) > --- > > (list userinfo host (and port (or (string->number port) port))) > %What's (or (string->number port) port) for? Couldn't it be this? (list userinfo host (and port (string->number port)))
Yes, right. Sorry, I tend to overlook the obvious.
> Your url-compat defs look ok, but I haven't got the time for full testing. > If you think it's safe (and perhaps Kon can say a word or two about this), > just check your changes in. I'd like to confirm one thing. My idea is to put this code into the url egg, and let uri egg be removed or replaced to simply (use url). Is it OK for you guys?
Yes, that would be ok for me. That we have two eggs about url/uri parsing is annyoing. Kon? cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
