felix winkelmann schrieb: > On 6/5/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Brandon Van Every scripsit: >> > Speed, to the exclusion of all other considerations, is not the real >> > world. I can understand compiling portable Scheme code under any 2 >> > different compilers. I cannot fathom trying to get such code to >> > interoperate. This thread reads like a Frankenstein support >> > nightmare. >> >> Developing code under Chicken is fairly straightforward; developing >> code under Stalin is painful in the extreme. It therefore is plausible >> to have a Stalin-compatible library for Chicken that allows one to >> develop code that Stalin can handle after it is fully debugged under >> Chicken. You can then gain the advantages of Stalin's massive >> optimizations to gain execution speed. >> > > BTW, has anyone gotten stalin to work lately? I ran my 512mb Athlon > for the whole night and was not able to compile stalin 0.11 (gcc 4.1.2). I didn't compile it myself, but it is in the universe repos of feisty fawn. It's version 0.11-1 so basically yes, i am able to work with it.
Greets David _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
