Okay, that's reasonable. I was under the impression that the fuse API is relatively fixed, now that it has been included in the Linux kernel, and Debian stable actually includes a somewhat recent version (2.5.something, I think), but if you feel that the dust hasn't settled yet, I can wait or use your sources whenever I feel the urge to write filesystems in Scheme. Though it should be noted that there are fuse bindings for Haskell, OCaml, Java, Python, Perl, and shell script (!), so everyone's favorite Scheme environment must not fall behind ;-)
-Ivan Dan Muresan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It would be possible, though as Mario's case shows there are > compatibility problems between various Linux distros (which could > quickly become a support nightmare). Also, I think I'd have to > downgrade to the lowest Fuse API version commonly in use, which is > less than ideal. > > For the moment I think it's best to copy the sources if you want to > write a new file system. If you don't touch the fusehi-related > sources, you'll be able to simply replace them when there are > updates. And if you do touch them, send a patch along so I can merge > your changes in :) > > Cheers, > Dan _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
