On 10/15/07, Tobia Conforto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Fredrickson wrote: > > ... we can see the macro expansion of parameterize using dynamic-wind. > > Dynamic-wind will call the function g6 before and after control enters > > or leaves the thunk, by call/cc, the basis of threads in chicken > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > No, I believe threads are orthogonal to continuations.
I was basing this analysis on a single line of text from the call/cc.org page. (It comprises my entire understanding of threads in chicken): "Lightweight threads based on first-class continuations" If this does not mean that threads are a implemented as continuations, what does it mean? -M _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
