On 10/21/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Bex scripsit: > > > Why is the difference between compiled and interpreted mode there? > > The meaning of these things isn't fundamentally different between the two > > modes, is it? Can't (declare) statements be parsed by the interpreter as > > well? > > They are trivially parsed and ignored with a warning.
And I don't like spurious warnings. They distract me, like chronic pain. Plus, it's so ugly that you are almost forced to use a better alternative: include, -uses or shared libraries. ;) Check the wiki for a thorough discussion on what 'use' does in which contexts. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
