On 11/5/07, Rick Taube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > so clearly we are not doing this right because nothing is declared as > safe however I dont see in the docs how to declare the run_process as > safe, can you help me out? or should we just use the first version > and wrap each clouser with error proctection boilerplate? >
I'm not sure yet that you do anything wrong. So this is an application that embeds compiled Scheme code into a C/C++ app, right? Do you run CHICKEN_run() once and does the Scheme code do a "(return-to host)"? In this situation, you don't need the "safe" versions of "foreign-lambda[*]" (I was refering to those, when I mentioned "safe", i.e. "foreign-safe-lambda[*]"). You need them when you have Scheme code (embedded or not) that calls C that calls Scheme again. So if you use "foreign-lambda"'s in your code that call back into Scheme, then replace them with "foreign-safe-lambda". Anyway, it's not trivial to get all this right, and the error messages are often misleading. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
