On Dec 6, 2007 10:00 PM, William Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, this brings us another question. Is it more efficient > to do something like what you have below than to add an egg? By > efficient, I mean both in speed and program size? I have it my > head that I am better off keeping to the routines in the language > rather than adding an egg. The code below does the one thing I > need. Obviously I use eggs where the task is larger or impossible > without. >
It's a matter of taste, but personally I prefer to minimize dependencies. So, if the simple, hand-rolled solution does the job, I'd prefer it over the more general, but external solution. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
