I am very much nitpicking at this point, but two minor suggestions: 1. "important SRFIs" -> "popular SRFIs"
2. "... libraries that make the programmer's task easier" -> "... practical libraries for everyday programming" John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > probably okay. I'm still avoiding the magic word "conformance". > New version: > > Chicken Scheme combines an optimising compiler with a reasonably fast > interpreter. It supports R5RS and the important SRFIs. The compiler > generates portable C code that supports tail recursion, first-class > continuations, and lightweight threads. The interface to and from C > libraries is flexible, efficient, and easy to use. There are hundreds > of contributed Chicken libraries that make the programmer's task easier. > The interpreter allows interactive use, fast prototyping, debugging, > and scripting. The active and helpful Chicken community fixes bugs and > provides support. Extensive documentation is supplied. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
