On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Mark Fredrickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I still think focusing on documentation is still a good idea for a > Hackathon goal, even if it has proven divisive. While I certainly have > opinions on the subject, I'd like to propose a compromise to keep us > moving forward. > > 1. Our primary focus is on updating documentation where it currently > resides (wiki, svn, etc) in the format it currently uses. Getting the > documentation that exists current is a big task as it is. Let's not > worry about moving documentation just yet. > > 2. Where documentation is non-existent, give the person(s) working on > the new documentation the right to choose the format. Again, let's > focus on building the bikeshed, not the color. > > 3. Let's put any new functionality on the back burner, at least when > talking about the Hackathon. Peter suggested this in his original > proposal and I think it is a good idea. That said, I too would be > interested in looking at literate programming options -- after the > Hackathon. :-) >
Very good points. I fully agree. One step at a time. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users