Graham Fawcett scripsit: > > (define sql-null (new-immediate-value)) > > > > (define (sql-null? x) (eq? x sql-null)) > > I think that, to work well, we'd have to define it statically, so that > all libraries using (sql-null) would have the same immediate value. > E.g. > > #>! > static C_word sql_null = ((C_word) ((C_word)(C_SPECIAL_BITS | 0x00000040))); > <#
I agree, and I'd be happy to see such a new object. I'd like not to have "sql" in the name, though, so that it can be used by interfaces to other languages as well (Lua nil, Java null, etc.) -- If you have ever wondered if you are in hell, John Cowan it has been said, then you are on a well-traveled http://www.ccil.org/~cowan road of spiritual inquiry. If you are absolutely [EMAIL PROTECTED] sure you are in hell, however, then you must be on the Cross Bronx Expressway. --Alan Feuer, NYTimes, 2002-09-20 _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
