On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 02:48:01PM -0400, Graham Fawcett wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > hart uses low-level macros only.
> 
> Is there a way I can alter hart so that it will play better with
> code that uses higher-level macro systems? I'd rather not rewrite
> it in syntax-case (though it's really not very much macro code;
> perhaps a syntax-case version wouldn't be that hard).
> 
> I confess to being an unhygienic, low-level macro user, and have
> to scratch my head whenever I encounter syntax-case code.

What about define-syntax, rather than syntax-case?  That's the only
thing I'm importing syntax-case for anyways.  (Yes, I'm friends with
John Cowan :)

-Robin

-- 
Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/


_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Reply via email to