On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:22 PM, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It wouldn't solve the data-punning problem. As long as the same object > can be seen one way by one module and another way by another, problems > will continue to be endemic. To fix that, we need two run-time types, > which I hereby dub restricted and unrestricted strings.
Just curious, whence the 'restricted' terminology? I would have thought 'utf8 and raw/byte strings' since that's the practical implication. G _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
