On 14 May 2008, at 3:52 pm, felix winkelmann wrote:
This hygienic chicken represents in my humble opinion the direction into which chicken should go. It breaks with backward compatibility in quite a number of points and will require major effort to port all eggs to (some eggs will have to be dropped). It would be helpful if the chicken users and hackers take a moment to consider whether this is acceptable and right, or whether we should keep the current system, which is less scalable in terms of modularity, but nevertheless quite stable.
You have my full support! And I'll rewrite my hygienic misc-macros to work with ER, just to fit into the new world order ;-) ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym Work: http://www.snell-systems.co.uk/ Play: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ Blog: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/?author=4 _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
