I am confused -- you talk about passing uncaught exceptions back to processes waiting for messages, and then you talk about preventing deadlock situations in a seemingly different scenario. Perhaps you would like to show some code examples? I don't know who is this "process-management model" and why I care about it, but I would like to see some examples of actual working code that cannot be reproduced with the MPI library.
-Ivan Alaric Snell-Pym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > IIRC there's more to it than that. As well as passing messages back > and forth, Erlang also has mechanisms for passing uncaught exceptions > in the top-levels of processes back to processes waiting for messages > from that process... or something like that. Something that prevents > deadlock situations where a client thread is waiting for a response > from a server thread that dies, without extra programmer effort, anyway. > > Also, is the MPI process-management model the same as Erlang's? > That's another important facet. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
