Matthew Welland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has anyone tried using datadraw (http://datadraw.sourceforge.net/) with > Chicken? If so did any of the claimed performance benefits transfer to > Chicken code? It almost seems like a scheme compiler or interpreter could > be built on top of datadraw or coupled extremely close to it rather than > moving data in and out of it but in any case an interface to chicken seems > like it'd be really cool.
Any comparison to Berkeley DB? Or is just anouther incarnation of GPL NIH? > I have some large chunks of data to munge and Chicken + sqlite3 is proving a > bit slow (8-20 hour run times) and I'm considering rethinking my approach. There's a trade between speed and persistency, you can't get both. If you want speed more than persistency, you should just drop the latter, use main-memory DB or even no DB at all, if you don't need query language or sharing data between processes. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
