On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Fadi Moukayed<smf...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why is Chicken using [random/srandom] instead of the > standard C rand/srand ? There shouldn't be any difference > functionality-wise AFAIK. rand(3) typically produces much less usable randomness than random(3) due to historical implementation. random(3) should only be used on UNIX platforms according to extras.scm, so there must be a platform detection issue. Not using mingw myself, I have to leave it to the mingw gurus to solve it. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
