Thomas Bushnell BSG scripsit: > In one sense, this is good news!
The two main pieces of good news in Chicken 4 are built-in macros and built-in modules. > A question: does the builtin syntax-rules accept the (... ...) syntax > that Dybvig's system does? My code has some macros that expand to macro > definitions, the canonical case where nested ... is often necessary. I doubt it, but _solvitur ambulando_. -- John Cowan co...@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan Any sufficiently-complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad-hoc, informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of half of Common Lisp. --Greenspun's Tenth Rule of Programming (rules 1-9 are unknown) _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
