I looked at the patch already, the INSTALL_LIB_HOME should take
precedence and is set by `make LIBDIR=/usr/lib64`, as you did in
the .spec file. In other words this should work without a patch
unless there is a problem with the build system.
So, please send full build output so we can review it, making sure to
run `make distclean` beforehand.
On Apr 13, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Adam Young wrote:
On 04/12/2010 05:53 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
Mixing works fine on Debian, on 64-bit Debian /usr/lib contains the
native libraries and lib64 is a symlink to /usr/lib, with lib32/
being a separate directory. This allows apps that expect plain /
usr/lib to work normally.
What I'm not clear on is why this is requires a patch in the first
place. You specified LIBDIR=/usr/lib64 in your .spec file, as far
as I know this should dump all library files into /usr/lib64 not /
usr/lib, and if it doesn't maybe there is a bug in the makefile?
Can you clarify what happens when you build with LIBDIR=/usr/lib64
(after a make distclean of course).
Look at the patch. The pathc /usr/lib is coded into a scheme source
file:csc.scm
(define library-dir
! (prefix "" "lib"
(if host-mode
INSTALL_LIB_HOME
TARGET_LIB_HOME)) )
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
