Sat, 04 Sep 2010 20:30:07 +0200 (CEST), hartrumpf wrote: > Sat, 04 Sep 2010 12:19:48 +0200 (CEST), felix wrote: >> Are these redefinitions genuine or are the warnings bogus? > > The warnings are ok because I define the three functions myself. > Can this be a problem here?
To answer my own question: I removed my three redefinitions (which were intended to help the optimizer), but nothing changed. >>> Error: (=) bad argument type - not a number: #f >>> >>> Call history: >>> >>> <syntax> (string-append (quote "/") (quote #f)) >>> <syntax> (quote "/") >>> <syntax> (##core#quote "/") >>> <syntax> (quote #f) >>> <syntax> (##core#quote #f) >>> <eval> (string-append (quote "/") (quote #f)) >>> <syntax> (string->number (quote #f)) >>> <syntax> (quote #f) >>> <syntax> (##core#quote #f) >>> <eval> (string->number (quote #f)) <-- >> >> This is during constant folding. In the compiler output lines "folding constant expression:", the above string-append expression does not occur. Greetings Sven _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
