On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:15AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > > > #;9> (irregex-match-valid-index? m 3) > > > 0 > > > > It returns #t for this in the upstream irregex. > > I'll look into that. It's probably a bug introduced by a > Chicken-specific optimization.
Yeah, it was a small oversight in a manual merge of a failed patch hunk for irregex upstream changeset 9c903144d459. It has been fixed in experimental 0ea0570b4555c737e35288ba9f43e45b25539913. Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
