Michele La Monaca scripsit: > > Chicken uses the local C's idea of number-to-string conversion. > > Not the best approach I think. I would rather prefer a consistent behavior.
If you want a specific output format, use the fmt egg. > Being a valid Scheme number it's not a valid reason to dislay it as > it is, IMHO. R5RS/R7RS merely require that "the result contains a decimal point and is expressed using the minimum number of digits (exclusive of exponent and trailing zeroes) needed to make the above expression true" (s.v. `number->string`). Both "1." and "1.0" satisfy that rule. -- No saves, Antonio, loke es morirse en su lingua. Es komo John Cowan kedarse soliko en el silensyo kada dya ke Dyo da, komo co...@ccil.org ser sikileoso sin saver porke. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --Marcel Cohen, 1985 _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
