Alex Shinn scripsit: > If people think it's useful I'd consider walking pairs and vectors.
They are the most important cases, because the expected value is expressed as a literal value, and that can only be a list or vector. If you are using `test-assert`, you can specify your own function directly. > Regardless, I'll add a utility to make defining tests with your own > comparator easier, and explicitly export test-approx-equal? so you > don't have to capture the initial test comparator. +1 -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org La mayyitan ma qadirun yatabaqqa sarmadi Fa idha yaji' al-shudhdhadh fa-l-maut qad yantahi. --Abdullah al-Hazred, Al-`Azif _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
