Wow...that is just perfect...suddenly I'm in love with Scheme :) On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Andy Bennett <andy...@ashurst.eu.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > > Actually due to the possible presence of nested commands, it should > > probably be something more generic, since in the last example: > > > > (bold (smallcap (size 2 "text"))) > > > > what the procedure 'bold' would be taking in is not a string "text", but > > rather an expression...so this is where I guess things would need to be > > recursive. > > The evaluation rules will evaluate things in the "correct" order. So > (size 2 "text") will be evaluated first, then (smallcap <>) and then > (bold <>). It's deliberately unspecified in which order 2 or "text" will > be evaluated in. > > > > > Regards, > @ndy > > -- > andy...@ashurst.eu.org > http://www.ashurst.eu.org/ > 0x7EBA75FF > >
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
