On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Jim Ursetto <zbignie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > #t does seem to make sense ... the existing behavior comes from the > srfi-37 implementation which sets the value to #f for #:none args. > Oh, yes, I see. I think #f would be reasonable if you were processing options with args-fold. Not so much if you want to use alist-ref - which, judging by your examples, is a practice you endorse. > I could modify the args egg to change #f to #t in this case; I don't think > this would cause any problems. Will think it over tonight. > Thanks for looking at it. Matt
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
