Alexej Magura scripsit: > Is there a sequential version of /set!/, as in /setq/?
There isn't, though it would be straightforward to write a macro. Scheme doesn't put as much emphasis on mutation as Common Lisp does; note that while `do` looks the same in Scheme as in Common Lisp, it does not mutate the iteration variables but rebinds them, and named `let` is all about looping while rebinding. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org You know, you haven't stopped talking since I came here. You must have been vaccinated with a phonograph needle. --Rufus T. Firefly _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
