On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:52:50AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to use scsh-process pass bignums arguments. > > Unfortunately scsh-process's maybe->string does not recognize them as > number?s and bails out. > > I can work around this easily, just use ->string at the invocation point. > I'd rather like to fix the root cause and not work around. But how?
Unfortunately, there's no real way around it. One can add numbers as a hard dependency to scsh-process, but if you follow that logic, you would end up having to add it as a dependency to EVERY EGG EVER. This is the disadvantage of having extended numbers bolted on, and the main reason I wanted them in core. Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
