On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:11:10 +0200 Lassi Kortela <la...@lassi.io> wrote:
>> Sure. What should it be called? > > Is "chicken-tools" ok? Or "chicken-integrations" or "chicken-contrib"? > Or even more generically, "chicken-scheme" which doesn't exist yet. > > It could be "chicken-emacs" but Dan suggested: > >> an organization that focuses on Chicken tool integration would be good; not >> just for Emacs. I'd love to see LSP support, for instance I like chicken-contrib. Any objections against this name? Or strong preference for another one? All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario
