> If there are few substantial differences, it would be a boon to writing > portable code if the same syntax is eventually used as for standard R7RS > libraries, and the same filename conventions are supported as other R7RS > implementations (the .sld filename extension for an R7RS library is > becoming a de facto standard). You already support (include "...") and > (cond-expand ...) in a similar manner as R7RS.
Note that include-files and loaded libraries are two different things, also in CHICKEN, libraries are usually compiled, so the .sld convention is only partially useful. felix
