Hi, Thanks for the rc1 fixes! Here are my 5.4-rc2 results:
HW: MacBook Air M2 (arm64) OS: macos Montery 12.7.5 CC: clang 14.0.0 & gcc 14.1.0 Installation works?: yes Tests work?: yes Installation and tests of "pastiche" egg works?: yes Installation and tests of "matrico" egg works?: yes Installation of "arcadedb" egg works?: yes I built with: make PREFIX=/tmp/chicken PLATFORM=macosx C_COMPILER=gcc install check Cheers Christian > On 25. Jun 2024, at 10:21, Peter Bex <pe...@more-magic.net> wrote: > > Hello all, > > The second release candidate for CHICKEN 5.4.0 is now available for > download: > > https://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2024/06/25/chicken-5.4.0rc2.tar.gz > > The sha256sum of that tarball is: > > 4733f7eaffbb9917605314fbc820ae693cb05a4d6829a229b0340ecd81479d72 > > The list of changes since 5.3.0 and 5.4.0rc1 is available here: > > https://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2024/06/25/NEWS > > This release candidate fixes a problem with chicken-install on > Windows when using the native shell, which would lead to empty .egg-info > files. The other fixes are all minor, mostly fixing build and test > suite issues. > > Please give it a test and report your findings to the mailing list. > > Here's a suggested test procedure: > > $ make PREFIX=<some dir> install check > $ <some dir>/bin/chicken-install pastiche > > If you want to build CHICKEN with a compiler other than the default one, > just use C_COMPILER=<the compiler> (e.g., C_COMPILER=clang) on the make > invocation. > > Of course, feel free to explore other supported build options (see the > README file for more information) and actually use CHICKEN 5.3.0rc2 for > your software. > > If you can, please let us know the following information about the > environment you tested the RC tarball on: > > Operating system: (e.g., FreeBSD 14.0, Debian 12, Windows 11 mingw-msys under > mingw32) > Hardware platform: (e.g., x86, x86-64, PPC) > C Compiler: (e.g., GCC 11.3.0, clang 16.0.6) > Installation works?: yes or no > Tests work?: yes or no > Installation of eggs works?: yes or no > > Thanks in advance! > > The CHICKEN Team >
