Undoubtedly that would work, but that defeats the purpose - letting the
authors know that there might be a problem is the better solution. ((
even though there wasn't a real problem this time ))
------ Original Message ------
From: "John Wuest" <[email protected]>
To: "Discussion of CHIRP" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun 1 30 22 14:14:49
Subject: Re: [chirp_users] RepeaterBook Queries return No Channels Found
Forget about the search from within CHIRP. Use the website results and
export the data to a CHIRP formatted file.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 2:18 PM Daniel Hallmark <[email protected]>
wrote:
Please disregard my previous No Channels Found report. I had
neglected to type in "mi" as the unit for the proximity distance
value. My mistake.
I did observe that when I performed a proximity query for 50 miles
around Fairfield Glade, TN on 2m, the response only contained 5
repeaters, but a similar query on the website for Confirmed On-Air FM
repeaters returns 17 repeaters (excluding those that report any kind
of digital capability, even just echolink or allstar). Is there a way
to clear up this apparent discrepancy in the query results?
Thanks,
Daniel (AE4ON)
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 1:26 PM Daniel Hallmark <[email protected]>
wrote:
Attempts to query RepeaterBook for either political or proximity
queries are returning "No channels found" even though I receive
results when I run the same queries via the RepeaterBook website.
_______________________________________________
chirp_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users
This message was sent to John Wuest at [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send an email to
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
chirp_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users
This message was sent to [email protected] at [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]
