Issue 390: Chrome crashes with sysinternals desktops program started
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=390

Comment #4 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[This is a copy of my post from Issue# 2730]

I have an idea. Two or more main instances of the browser can communicate  
to each other via TCP
to see if the other is alive or not.

What if each main instance of Chrome creates a temporary session storage in  
a sub-folder?
~ Each instance uses the main profile + a temporary session profile  
assigned to it.
~ When an instance exits, it notifies the others (if any), synchronizes  
with the main profile
and removes the temporary.
~ If an instance is killed or crushes, its temporary profile will remain on  
disk.
~ The next time an instance of the browser is started, it asks the other  
instances (if any)
"Who owns this temporary profile?". If no one (may be Chrome crushed, was  
killed or a power
failure)... Ask the user if the of lost profiles (there could be more than  
one) should be
merged to the main or discarded.

By the way I spend some time testing Internet Explorer 8's incognito mode  
and they are doing
something very stupid. Instead of using a temporary storage, they simply  
delete anything from
the main profile, after you quit the incognito session. The expected  
behavior would be to use a
temporary (isolated storage) and discard it.



-- 
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Chromium-bugs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to