Comment #33 on issue 158 by brent.lamborn: Incognito window, not so 'incognito' with Flash content http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=158
Yep. For Photoshop.com to "forget" how you are, it would take Adobe modifying Flash such that it recognizes the Flash object is being loaded into an Incognito browser window, and then adjust the flash application so that it does not store and Local Shared Objects (flash cookies). Or Flash will need to add a property such that the Flash developer can perform a different action if the user is in Incognito mode. In my opinion, the later is much more likely to happen. It's unlikely Flash would deny an application the ability to set an LSO. It's far more likely Adobe will pass it on to the application developer to decide whether or not the application should behave differently if the user is in Incognito mode. I can see down the line where a Flash app will identify itself as being "private- broswing compliant" so the user knows the application respects his/her desire to have no artifacts placed on their machine by the application. I think the right decision was made to expose incognito mode to plugins. Just my 2 cents. :) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/ Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
