Comment #13 on issue 17569 by [email protected]: Crash in SkARGB32_Black_Blitter::blitMask http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=17569
btw Huan, to clarify: the skia revision I'm referring to is 275 was never reverted, only the update from 279:284 was. I'm just wondering if something in that new code makes it more likely to hit stack corruption when on the main thread. I did check on Windows and both before and after there'd be 1MB of reserved stack space. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/ Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
