per-machine extensions are very important. that turns out to greatly simplify the task of distributing an extension via a third-party installer. -darin
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Peter Kasting <pkast...@chromium.org>wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Aaron Boodman <a...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Any thoughts, either on advantages or disadvantages to installing >> extensions per-chrome install, or to assuming that there is only one >> profile per browser process? > > > From a user perspective, I would very much want per-profile extensions. I > have no opinion on whether per-machine extensions would be widely useful (I > suggest punting that until someone cares) but I would certainly not want > that to be the only, or the default, choice. > > PK > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to chromium-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to chromium-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
