On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Matt Perry <mpcompl...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:35 AM, John Abd-El-Malek <j...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> Looks good, one comment: previously there's been some high level
>> comments about how workers can be used to give extensions a long lived
>> context. If this is still the case, would an extension that used a
>> worker & UI end up having to use two processes?
>
> We haven't thought too much about this yet, but I think the answer is yes.
> We would rely on whatever system we use for workers in the normal web case,
> which is looking like it will require a separate worker process.
I thought we were moving away from reusing Workers and thinking of the
shared, long-lived context as a more-or-less normal renderer instead.
- a
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
