On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 09:10, Steven Knight <s...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Excellent idea re: qual script.  What I'd like to do is turn these items
> into sanity-check tests for a buildbot slave that specifically tests and
> times issues about the build itself:  build time stats, size of dependency
>
> graphs, verify presence of symbols in Debug, etc.
>
> Hopefully it'll be a while before we have to convert to Yet Another build
> system, but it will happen some day, and a little effort now capturing
> these issues in testable form will save us a lot of hassle when it does.
>
> IMHO, there'd be way too much to unwind to revert now,
> what with the buildbot changes and all.
>
>
These problems seem pretty fundamental. I see some changes out for review to
fix things, but I remain concerned that there are problems we haven't
uncovered yet.

If we can't fix the issues asap, we need to revert (no matter how painful).
We can't have the Linux builds in an unkown state.

--Mark


>
>
>         --SK
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:21 AM, John Grabowski <j...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Dean, sounds like you have the seeds of a qual script.  Perhaps you could
>> itemize them into a form which sgk can use as a proof test before the next
>> switch-over (assuming this gets reverted)?
>> jrg
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Dean McNamee <de...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I confirmed the debug build line has no -g.
>>>
>>> Also, all of the buildbots are red because of ICU issues:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Modules%20Linux%20(dbg)/builds/6601/steps/test_shell_tests/logs/MimeTypeTests<http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Modules%20Linux%20%28dbg%29/builds/6601/steps/test_shell_tests/logs/MimeTypeTests>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dan Kegel <daniel.r.ke...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > And it seems to be built without debugging flags in debug mode.
>>> > At least, I can't single-step through code on Linux.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Dean McNamee <de...@chromium.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> (this isn't just V8, all of chromium is built without optimization in
>>> >> release).  There are lots of other issues all over the place.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Dean McNamee <de...@chromium.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> Notice the lack of -O2, etc.  This also broke SYMBOLS= PROFILE=,
>>> COVERAGE=, etc.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I am tempted to revert it all.
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to