Thanks! This is awesome. Since "Where are the perf graphs?" is one the most asked questions, I will answer it even before someone asks:
Go to the waterfall (http://build.chromium.org), click on the perf link in the top left corner. To find the size graphs, scroll down to the bottom of the page. Click on the graph name to see it bigger. Quick link to chrome.dll over the last 6000 revs : http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/xp-release/sizes/report.html?header=chrome.dll&graph=chrome.dll&history=1200 Quick link to chrome.exe over the last 6000 revs : http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/xp-release/sizes/report.html?header=chrome.exe&graph=chrome.exe&history=1200 <http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/xp-release/sizes/report.html?header=chrome.exe&graph=chrome.exe&history=1200> Nicolas On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Steven Knight <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > The perf dashboard now tracks byte sizes of (some) key built targets. > Scroll to the bottom of the dashboard for the thumbnails. > > This is primitive, but provides a place to start adding more sophisticated > tracking. Let me know what you'd like to see. > > Right now, it just tracks the size of various files built by the following > builders: > > - Chromium XP: chrome.dll, chrome.exe, mini_installer.exe, setup.exe > - Chromium Linux: chrome, chrome.pak > - Mac Perf: Chromium, Chromium.app > > All of the above are simple byte sizes, with the exception of Chromium.app > where it's recording the size of the Chromium.app tree as reported by du -s. > > The UI is the same as for the perf graphs. Click through on the Linux or > Mac graphs and you'll also find graphs for text|data|bass of chrome, or > __TXT|__DATA||__OBJ of Chromium (mainly because it was easy to pull that > info out of the "size" command). > > For chrome.dll, chrome.exe and mini_installer.exe, I extracted historical > data back to last September from the available continuous snapshots, so > there's already some richness to those graphs. The others are all getting > populated starting now--that is, as I write this, they're all rather > uninteresting blank graphs consisting of a single data point, but should, > barring unforeseen problems, start looking more interesting tomorrow. > > Let me know about problems, questions, suggestions, etc. > > --SK > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
