Yup, I'm looking to work thru things in a similar fashion with anders
(original appcache author).

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM, David Levin <le...@google.com> wrote:
> I think how to split/refactor depends on the feature, understanding the
> current code, and working with the appropriate webkit dev.
> For workers, we thought about how/where it made sense to split the impl for
> chrome and talked with a...@webkit about it.  There was some iteration as we
> figured out things better and as he made suggestions and it has worked out
> fine so far.
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Michael Nordman <micha...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> +chromium-dev
>>
>> Designing things in this front/back fashion and re-using the code
>> entirely in chrome removes at least one high-coefficient of friction
>> surface rubbing between the chromium and webkit teams. We will likely
>> pay a higher price up front, but it should pay dividends down the
>> road. Add an interesting feature and iphone, andriod, chrome, and
>> safari all pick it up.
>>
>> I'm worried about the logistics of pulling this off for the appcache
>> given the existing impl is live and in use in iphone and safari and
>> soon andriod. We're talking about 'refactoring' or 'replacing'
>> existing impls with new ones that support a remote backend. How can we
>> reduce the upfront cost?
>>
>> * maybe build these new impls out in webcore w/o disrupting the existing
>> impl
>> * use the new impl for chrome (and any other webkit consumer that
>> wishes to compile the new impls in would be free to do so)
>> * somewhere down the road, deprecate the existing impl in favor of the
>> new impl in webcore
>>
>> We haven't talked to the webkit guys about logistics like this, no
>> data on where their head is?
>>
>>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to