I know this is only for complaints ;) but I like the present look.
The clues as to where each omnibox suggestion comes from are great,
clear and useful!
- Itai
On May 14, 3:22 pm, "Ben Goodger (Google)" <b...@chromium.org> wrote:
> I have adjusted the transparency slightly, and disabled it altogether
> when Glass isn't active. Let me know how annoying it is now. (I have a
> knob, and can adjust the annoyingness).
>
> -Ben
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Mike Belshe <mbel...@google.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Mohamed Mansour <m0.interact...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Great! adds a new fresh look.
>
> > +1
>
> >> One question though, is the transparency really needed? It distracts me
> >> for some reason from the actual results. I suggest lowering down the
> >> transparency a little, but that's just me.
>
> > +1 - I don't like the transparency either. I'd prefer opaque.
> > Mike
>
> >> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) <b...@chromium.org>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> Please try out the --enable-omnibox2 command line switch in Chrome and
> >>> file bugs against me in the issue tracker. I'd like to get a better
> >>> sense of what needs to be done with it so we can turn it on by
> >>> default.
>
> >>> The differences thus far are aesthetic, and in the popup.
>
> >>> -Ben
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
