If our binding code is already upstream by then, Darin may be able to keep Chromium building throughout the process. https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26567
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow<jor...@chromium.org> wrote: > FYI from the webkit mailing list. > > We'll probably want to prepare a similar CL for our binding generating code > and whoever is doing the merges should look out for this change being > landed. > > J > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Darin Adler <da...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> The IDL file format we use to generate our bindings has some things in >> common with WebIDL and many differences. There are extended attributes we >> use that exist in WebIDL but with a different name. >> >> As a first step in making our IDL syntax be as close to the WebIDL >> standard as possible, I’d like to move our extended attributes so they go in >> the appropriate place in the syntax. Ours currently come later in an >> attribute definition; WebIDL puts them before the attribute definition. >> >> I have a patch to do this in this bug >> <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26398>. Currently the patch >> contains the code changes to make the binding machinery parse the new >> syntax, and a couple hand-converted files. >> >> I plan to write a script to convert all the IDL files to the new syntax. >> Should be easy. >> >> Not sure about what impact this will have for V8. >> >> -- Darin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-...@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
