yea I noticed that KDevelop does intellisense much better than MS does
intellisense (all I had to do was set the header includes path to
src/, and it was essentially instant to parse the symbols). I'm not
sure what the point of a generator for it would be though. What
advantage is there to building in KDevelop rather than from terminal?
-- Evan Stade
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)<b...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Much encouragement to anyone that wants to implement a KDevelop generator.
>
> -Ben
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Dan Kegel<d...@kegel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Nesting. CMake claims to be able to generate build configs in all
>> sorts of formats, and so does gyp. It would just be fun to
>> see CMake dancing to gyp's tune, or vice versa.
>>
>> But you're right, I don't think it'd be particularly useful.
>> It'd be more interesting to understand the originally reported problem,
>> "pain on for example xcode or kdevelop users".
>> What is the problem, again?
>> Does the OP want xcode or kdevelop to run gyp when the user starts a build?
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Steven Knight<s...@google.com> wrote:
>>> What's the coolness here?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote:
>>>> In particular, a CMake backend for gyp might be cool.
>>
>> >
>>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
