On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:14 PM, cpu<c...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>
> We need a better way to talk about this perf gain. I agree is 12% ops/
> second in that particular set of benchmarks. My recollection is that
> we removed LFH because it was using too much memory. We need some form
> of normalized score based on memory usage. In other words 12% with 25%
> more memory usage might not be in practice a gain at all in machines
> with 1GB. I do agree that with all other things equal Vista is faster
> than XP and the memory usage of both is quite different as well.
That's a fair point. Maybe we should fall back the stock allocator on
<=1 gb of RAM if we get enough data that it would reduce the system
stress and in better overall efficiency. Mike, what do you think?
M-A
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
