Nope, but I've cc'ed myself.  Listening to the channel should keep script alive.

Adam


On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Antony Sargent<asarg...@google.com> wrote:
> Adam, speaking of garbage collection and content scripts, have you seen
> http://crbug.com/17410?
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Adam Barth <aba...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:12 AM, dwh<dawag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I believe as a side-effect of this, content scripts can no longer at
>> > all access frames in pages (window.frames is a single frame, rather
>> > than a collection of them all)... I view this decidedly as a bug
>> > rather than feature, and cannot see a reason to intentionally do this
>> > (if we can access the DOM of the page, why not also of sub-pages?)
>> >
>> > Could this be looked at and fixed?
>>
>> Yes.  This is a known issue (although I'm not sure if there is a bug
>> on file for it).  I haven't quite figured out the right way to do this
>> yet because it involves some tricky garbage collection issues.  Rest
>> assured that it will get fixed in due course.
>>
>> If you run into other issues, please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Adam
>>
>> >>
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to