On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Ojan Vafai <o...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Jeremy Orlow <jor...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Nicolas Sylvain <nsylv...@chromium.org>wrote:
>>
>>> 2. The show stopper for any implementation of this feature is that the
>>> machines running the layout tests don't have the pdbs for test_shell. Since
>>> the binary is built on another machine, it was too slow to copy the pdbs
>>> from one machine to another. If you guys think it's important, and can take
>>> the ~30-60 more seconds to cycle the bots, then we can copy them too, and
>>> the feature would work.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not really sure what the right answer is. It sure would be nice if we
>> didn't need to use a tool to decode the call stacks of crashed layout tests.
>> I kind of feel like an additional 30-60 seconds isn't going to be a big
>> deal on these bots, but maybe it is. What do people think?
>>
>
> A minute is a really long amount of time to add for the bots to cycle. Our
> goal historically has been 5 minutes for a full cycle. The tree is generally
> so much greener and easier to keep that way when we have fast cycle times.
> If there is a way to do it that doesn't require hitting the critical path, I
> think we should seriously consider it.
>
K. I'll assume that's not an option when I look into this, then.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
