On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Thomas Van Lenten <thoma...@chromium.org>wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Evan Martin <e...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> >> PS Every time I want to call it the "EPIC CHANGE". >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Evan Martin<e...@chromium.org> wrote: >> > Here's a guess: the "history" file is restored each time the test >> > runs, and Brett's epoch change means that we need to re-migrate the >> > history file every time we start. >> > >> > (I don't recall how this test works, but it seems logical to test NTP >> > performance you'd want some data that the NTP would make use of...) > > > Wouldn't linux show this data also? or the non theme test also show it? > I spoke too soon: http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/linux-release-hardy/new-tab-ui-cold/report.html?history=150 looks like linux also sees it. TVL > > TVL > > >> >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Mike Pinkerton<pinker...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> If you look at >> >> >> >> >> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/mac-release-10.5/new-tab-ui-cold/report.html?history=150 >> >> >> >> You'll see a pretty big spike in new tab performance between r24415 and >> r24419 >> >> >> >> >> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/dashboard/ui/changelog.html?url=/trunk/src&mode=html&range=24415:24419 >> >> >> >> Anyone know what's going on? This is a very serious regression and >> >> there were no Mac-specific changes anywhere in the vicinity that I >> >> could see. I filed >> >> >> >> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20312 >> >> >> >> to cover the regression. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Mike Pinkerton >> >> Mac Weenie >> >> pinker...@google.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
