On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Amanda Walker <ama...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Marshall Greenblatt < > magreenbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm putting together a new computer and I'd like to optimize my chromium >> build times :-) Is anyone currently building chromium using a solid state >> drive? Have you noticed any compile or link time speed improvements relative >> to using a second traditional SATA drive? >> > > Other people can chime in about windows ssd performance, but I have an SSD > in a Mac laptop that I sometimes do builds on. Total build time is only > marginally better than a traditional SATA drive (a few percent), but the > machine is noticeably less sluggish doing other things during a build (when > there's any disk contention happening, the faster seek time and i/o > operations per second are a definite win). But for overall build time, I've > found that RAM and CPU cores make much more of a difference than the drive. > >From what I've heard, SVN and searching within a project are faster with a SSD. As for the system getting sluggish during compile: this can also be solved by having a 2nd hard drive that contains all the source + build files. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---