On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Amanda Walker <ama...@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Marshall Greenblatt <
> magreenbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm putting together a new computer and I'd like to optimize my chromium
>> build times :-) Is anyone currently building chromium using a solid state
>> drive? Have you noticed any compile or link time speed improvements relative
>> to using a second traditional SATA drive?
>>
>
> Other people can chime in about windows ssd performance, but I have an SSD
> in a Mac laptop that I sometimes do builds on.  Total build time is only
> marginally better than a traditional SATA drive (a few percent), but the
> machine is noticeably less sluggish doing other things during a build (when
> there's any disk contention happening, the faster seek time and i/o
> operations per second are a definite win).  But for overall build time, I've
> found that RAM and CPU cores make much more of a difference than the drive.
>

>From what I've heard, SVN and searching within a project are faster with a
SSD.  As for the system getting sluggish during compile: this can also be
solved by having a 2nd hard drive that contains all the source + build
files.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to