On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
<phajdan...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 00:44, Ian Fette <i...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> In an effort to provide more transparency into what the team is working
>> on, I'm sending out the meeting notes from the green tree task force to
>> chromium-dev, below. I will try to send further notes to chromium-dev from
>> our meetings.
>
> Sounds great!
>
>>
>> Flakiness
>>
>> Brought down to acceptable levels for unit tests. Need help to keep it
>> that way and not regress.
>
> I think that unit_tests are well and happy, but ui_tests are another story.
> We have UI tests which have more than 100 flaky flips in just two weeks. And
> we have UI tests which fail on almost every try run. IMHO such "outstanding"
> (is that the right word?) cases of flakiness should be fixed with a high
> enough priority.
> And we still have lots of problems with resource-related flakiness, like
> this:
>
> [FATAL:resource_bundle.cc(133)] Check failed: false.
>
> [FATAL:tab_renderer.cc(132)] Check failed: waiting_animation_frames->width()
> % waiting_animation_frames->height() == 0.
I suspect this happens when the theme resources aren't correctly
built. Perhaps we should have this check early on in ui tests so that
we don't run any tests if this check fails.
-Scott
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
