On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Evan Martin <ev...@google.com> wrote:
> Since we're talking about style, I'll note that this pattern is no > good (and I've seen it explicitly called out somewhere before). > > The problem is that your assertions are not helpful. You get > "expected 'foo', got 'bar' on line 80" but line 80 is just the body of > a for loop. (a) I frequently write EXPECT_EQ(a, b) << "Test case in question is " << c; (b) Even when this is not true it costs me almost no time to track down the case in question in the debugger (if I need to; often the expected result is unique) Don't assume what is and is not helpful to me. PK -- Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev