On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Kirk M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the link Sean. Quick question here. Not ever installing > Chromium this way and although I actually succeeded in getting the > latest version installed correctly, could you tell me if all I really > needed was the Mini installer or both the installer and the latest .zip > as well (downloading both into the same folder). I couldn't really tell > what was happening during the install. > > I know, kind of a stupid question but it would set me at ease here.
I don't suggest you install the trunk build on your machine, except if you are testing the installer. But if you still want to install it, mini_installer is good enough. The reason I said that I don't suggest it is because this build is not auto updated, so you won't get the new version when it's ready. You'll have to install it manually. These builds are also buggy and have never been tested formally by anyone. I do like to use these builds to see the current status of the build, but I don't install it, I just unzip the chrome_win32.zip file, and I can run chrome directly from there without installing. Nicolas > > > On 9/24/2008 6:32 AM, Sean Bell wrote: > > I just want to make sure that everyone knows that you can test out all > > of the latest and greatest bug fixes using the trunk builds - download > > then here: > > > > http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp/ > > > > For example, the latest is build 2545 modified 23-Sep-2008 23:35; > > > > The last official released dev build is the following (from > > about:version): > > Google Chrome 0.2.152.1 <http://0.2.152.1> (Official Build 2164) > > > > > > Thus 2.152.1 is a couple weeks old and a whole bunch of trunk code > > builds old - go download and start testing the latest and greatest! > > > > -Sean > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Kirk M <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > Oh fer heavens sake, no problem...take your time. There's > > obviously more > > going into a development build than just a fix for a broken update > UI. > > Getting the next build built and everything correct (as much as > > feasibly > > possible this early in the game) is the primary concern and it's > worth > > the wait. Gives us more time for constructive feedback and general > > complaining. ;) > > > > On 9/23/2008 11:28 AM, Finnur Thorarinsson wrote: > > > No, the update to 0.2.152.1 <http://0.2.152.1> > > <http://0.2.152.1> has yet to be > > > published. Sorry to keep you waiting. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:21, dtfinch <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Monday came and went. No auto-update. Paradoxes don't fix > > themselves. > > > We're stuck with the broken version until someone puts up a > > manual > > > download link. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
