This would just annoy me, personally, it is more eye-candy than use to be honest, and i hate "short animations" in interfaces, i *want* instant. Menu items are just plain and simple, no need to move diagonally for things, just down. (generally)
But it would be a great idea for an add-on. Not sure if there will be support for *replacing* the context menu (adding menu items however, oh yes yes yes), but there might be now if enough people like it and think it would be of use. Plus, the same idea could be used to create more compact menus, or change the style of the menus to fit in with a theme. (such as adding larger borders, a heading, background image or whatever other fancy stuff people might like) On Aug 13, 12:23 pm, Shadow <[email protected]> wrote: > I have posted this on the 'Support Forums' under Chrome suggestions > however also felt it appropriate to post it on the Chromium discussion > group; for discussion purposes. > > Let me know what you think. > > ----------------------------------------- > > Original > Post:http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=237226f0615d2dbc > Post with > Mock-ups:http://www.shadowsplace.net/general/chrome-esque-icon-based-orbital-c... > > ----------------------------------------- > > Chrome prides itself on being a fast and efficient browser. This icon- > based orbital context menu suggestion would set chrome apart from the > 'others', by revamping the currently 'boring' and monotonous right > click menu, which is currently common across all browsers (at least > ones that I've used!). Take a moment to read the brief below, and let > me know what you think of the idea. > > - Menu Design - > > Designed in a Chrome-esque fashion, right click items are instead > represented by icons and placed in a circle around the right click > position. The icons would be a monotone colour, matching the dominant > GUI colour of Chrome (depending on theme of course), but ultimately be > simple outlines of the 'action' in question. Icons such as a printer > would represent the action 'Print...', while a floppy disk would > represent the action 'Save As...', view page source represented by a > magnifying glass over a text-filled page just to lead a few ideas. I > might make a mock-up and post it on here assuming I get time! > > Icons are more memorable and quickly identifiable then searching a > menu full of text. This icon based orbital context menu would mean > actions such as Back, Forward, Reload could all be formed much faster, > not dissimilar to 'gestures'. Placement examples include where the > 'Back' icon/action would be optimally placed to the 'left' of the > orbital menu, while 'Forward' icon/action would be optimal on the > 'right'. > > This menu is similar to that used in 'The Sims' and 'Left 4 Dead'. > > Icons would appear after the user right clicks; a short animation as > if the icons were 'emerging' from the right click origin (as opposed > to all appearing instantly, all at once). When hovered, the icon would > appear 'highlighted' and given a more dominant position. This is > explained in more detail, below. > > - Menu Usability - > > The user would ultimately select an option my moving the mouse in the > direction of the action. The action is then 'highlighted' (by > increasing in size and increase in icon brightness, possible with a > light 'aurora' behind it), while a text label of the action in > question could also appear. The mouse action would be unique in that > when the user holds down the right click button, the menu appears, and > the action will be selected once the user releases the right mouse > button. This of course could be an option in the settings depending on > the user's preference. Alternatively the orbital context menu would > stay open until the user clicks again. > > The mouse action used to say preset words in 'Left 4 Dead' would be > the optimal mouse selection method while the mouse action in menus of > 'The Sims' would be similar to the 'alternative' (set on an option > basis in Chrome 'Options') method. While the later method would be > somewhat less efficient, it would still be easier to navigate than the > current implementation. > > The orbital menu would resize depending on how many actions are > available, for example, when right clicking in a text box, the number > of actions is greater than the context menu of a link. Icons would be > about 48x48 at most, however could also resize based on the current > 'zoom' level of a web page. > > - Overall - > > This feature would set Chrome apart with a unique context menu that > could potentially also make its way into the 'download' and 'history' > pages as well. The icons are easier to 'remember' and would speed up > user browsing time. > > Take a moment to leave your thoughts below. I already can imagine the > implementation, can you?! > > ----------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
